Tesla CEO Elon Musk, by way of his lawyer, accused the Securities and Alternate Fee of leaking details about a federal investigation with a purpose to retaliate in opposition to him for public criticism of the federal monetary regulators.

In a letter on Monday to U.S. District Choose Alison Nathan, Musk lawyer Alex Spiro wrote: “It has turn out to be clearer and clearer that the Fee is out to retaliate in opposition to my purchasers for exercising their First Modification rights—most lately by criticizing the Fee on the general public docket and by petitioning this Courtroom for reduction.”

The letter comes 4 days after Musk initially alleged that the SEC was engaged in harassment by regularly investigating him, that the company was making an attempt to relax his proper to free speech, and had uncared for their duties to remit $40 million to shareholders that Tesla and Musk beforehand paid in fines to settle securities fraud fees.

Spiro didn’t specify which investigation or what sort of data might have been leaked by the SEC, and to whom. Within the letter, he alleged that a minimum of one member of the SEC had leaked “sure data relating to its investigation” with out offering any supporting proof.

Spiro couldn’t be instantly reached for remark. The SEC didn’t instantly reply for remark.

The battle between Musk and the SEC started in September 2018 when the SEC charged Musk with making “false and deceptive” statements to traders after he wrote on Twitter that August that he had secured sufficient funding for a large non-public buyout of Tesla at $420 a share. The inventory seesawed all month and the deal Musk alluded to by no means materialized.

Musk and Tesla needed to pay $20 million in fines every, and Musk was pressured to step down as chairman for a minimum of three years as a part of a revised settlement settlement the company reached with the automaker and CEO in 2019. Tesla additionally needed to put in place a system for monitoring Musk’s statements to the general public in regards to the firm — whether or not on Twitter, in a weblog submit or some other medium.

The SEC’s Steven Buchholz replied to the sooner allegations on Friday, saying the company was really making progress on the duty of disbursing the $40 million to shareholders. He characterised the duty as advanced and famous that Tesla and Musk had by no means expressed any concern about remittance earlier than. SEC workers expects to submit a “proposed plan of distribution” to the courtroom for approval by the top of March 2022, he wrote.

Buchholz additionally wrote that ongoing communication with Tesla was what Nathan and the revised settlement settlement had known as for, and that if Musk objected to any subpoena his attorneys ought to deal with that in a distinct movement. There is a completely different federal statutory scheme for objecting to a subpoena.

Tesla disclosed in a 2021 fourth-quarter earnings report that the SEC issued a subpoena to the corporate in November 2021. Based on Tesla’s quarterly submitting, the company is looking for data on its “governance processes round compliance with the SEC settlement, as amended.”

Spiro revealed within the letter on Monday some particulars about that subpoena. He wrote, “the Fee particularly demanded paperwork regarding my purchasers’ ‘compliance or non-compliance with Tesla’s disclosure controls and procedures, government communications coverage, exterior communications coverage, different insurance policies or procedures regarding public statements or communications by Tesla executives, or the ultimate judgment or amended ultimate judgment in SEC v. Musk, 1:18-cv-8865-AJN (S.D.N.Y.).’

He additionally mentioned the SEC issued a separate, however related subpoena to Musk.

The November subpoena got here shortly after Musk polled his tens of thousands and thousands of Twitter followers in asking if he ought to promote 10% of his stake in Tesla. They voted sure. However a serious portion of the gross sales that adopted the Twitter ballot had been a part of a plan that Musk adopted in September 2021.