The IRS has opened a can of worms whose lid was already struggling to keep closed. The U.S. division answerable for taxation has printed an inventory of electrical autos that qualify for tax credit underneath the phrases of final yr’s Inflation Act, and a number of other huge names have been shocked to seek out their vehicles don’t qualify.

It’s all to do with how the car is assessed, particularly whether or not it’s a truck, an SUV or an ‘different,’ which is IRS-speak for vehicles. For a automobile to qualify it should price not more than $55,000, however SUVs and vehicles can price as much as $80,000 and nonetheless be eligible for credit. To the shock of many, although, varied autos which might be broadly accepted to be SUVs by the general public usually are not ranked as SUVs, however vehicles. That’s not an issue for lower-priced model of the Mustang Mach-E, which price lower than $55,000 and so duck underneath the ‘automobile’ worth cap, however it’s a biggie for the Cadillac Lyriq, which begins at $62,990.

The way in which the IRS arrives at its classifications is fascinating, involving geeky knowledge like gross autos weight and strategy and departure angles, and throws up a number of anomalies, not least that the IRS’s personal classification differs from that of different authorities departments, such because the EPA, for a similar car. You may, and may, learn our full story on this case by clicking on the hyperlink beneath this paragraph.

Associated: What’s A Automotive? What’s An SUV? Right here’s How The IRS Classifies Autos For The EV Tax Credit score

However we felt the story raised some wider points that merited their very own separate submit. A kind of is that this complete debacle has reminded us how blurred the boundaries now are between car varieties. Fifty years in the past issues had been quite simple. Vehicles had been low and had two or 4 doorways and SUVs had been tall, agricultural beasts constructed for individuals who genuinely wanted off-road capacity, and even a visually impaired mole wouldn’t wrestle to inform the 2 aside.

However then SUVs modified. They began driving like vehicles, after which they began wanting like vehicles, a few of them even gaining coupe-like rooflines. After which simply to additional confuse issues we had been offered with crossovers, which as their identify suggests, had been supposed to bridge the hole between the 2. Nearly each week at Carscoops we wrestle with labels for the brand new vehicles we’re writing about. Is that this a automobile or a crossover? Is that this a crossover or an SUV?

Most SUVs are simply vehicles in disguise

The fact is that in nearly each case they’re simply vehicles. The Audi This autumn-etron, the BMW iX, the Cadillac Lyriq, the Ford Mustang Mach-E, the Tesla Mannequin Y and dozens of others like them are simply vehicles. A few of them may not seem like the autos we historically confer with as vehicles, very like a hatchback doesn’t seem like a sedan, however we principally purchase SUVs to do the identical job we used to ask vehicles to hold out, which suggests they have to even be vehicles, plain and easy.

A few of us would possibly admire the towing capability and a handful would possibly make use of the off-road capacity if the SUV in query even has any. A Jeep Wrangler does, however many don’t, regardless of what the strategy and departure stats would possibly recommend. Nearly all are on avenue tires, and a few are two-wheel drive (although solely AWD autos qualify for SUV tax credit). Principally we use our SUVs to take our children to high school, to drive to work and all of these different chores {that a} common automobile can deal with for us, simply with out the perceived additional avenue cred and excessive driving place.

However we’re all for individuals having a selection. In order for you an SUV, that’s cool – there’s one on my driveway as I write this. We willingly pay extra to have them as an alternative of an odd automobile and we additionally pay extra to drive them as a result of they’re heavier, much less aerodynamic, have fatter tires that create extra drag, and they also devour extra vitality transferring about. However why ought to individuals be incentivized to make that selection?

Rewarding inefficiency sends the mistaken message

Neglect for a second the truth that some SUVs qualify as SUVs within the IRS’s reckoning and subsequently qualify for tax credit, whereas others don’t. Absolutely the query is why is there a separate worth cap in any respect? Why ought to SUVs and their consumers be given particular remedy? If at the least a part of the motivation behind the entire tax credit scheme is to encourage individuals not merely to purchase electrical autos, however to purchase extra environment friendly autos, then why ought to we be reducing slack to SUVs which, by design are the least environment friendly form of vehicles on sale?

It appears grossly unfair to disclaim somebody shopping for a $56,000 electrical sedan entry to tax credit when somebody shopping for an SUV from the identical producer and powered by the identical motors, however providing much less effectivity as a result of it’s heavier and taller, continues to be entitled to credit proper as much as an $80,000 listing worth. That’s like saying SUV drivers or V12 homeowners needs to be entitled to purchase cheaper fuel as a result of their autos devour extra of it.

And SUVs aren’t solely much less environment friendly than vehicles, they pose a much bigger risk to the protection of different highway customers. This week the pinnacle of the Nationwide Transportation Security Board expressed concern concerning the hazard that heavy electrical autos pose to different vehicles in the event that they’re concerned in a collision.

“I’m involved concerning the elevated danger of extreme damage and demise for all highway customers from heavier curb weights and growing dimension, energy, and efficiency of autos on our roads, together with electrical autos,” Jennifer Homendy mentioned in a speech to the Transportation Analysis Board, highlighting the truth that the two,900 lbs (1,300 kg) battery pack in a 9,000 lbs (4,000 kg) Hummer EV weighs nearly as a lot as a complete Honda Civic. So we have now one department of the federal government encouraging individuals to purchase electrical SUVs whereas one other is telling us they’re a horrible thought.

Associated: This Is What Ought to We Name ‘Petrolheads’ As soon as EVs Take Over In accordance To You

It’s value noting that electrical vehicles even have an $80,000 worth cap, and we’re nicely conscious that individuals typically purchase pickups to make use of like vehicles. However greater vehicles are normally conceived and made otherwise from vehicles, and extra more likely to be purchased for the abilities that solely a truck can ship, so we are able to stay with that distinction. And there actually isn’t a lot selection under $55,000 relating to flatbeds with electrical powertrains, the once-tempting sub-$40k beginning worth for the Ford F-150 Lightning having ballooned to $56,000 in lower than a yr.

The SUV cap must go although, within the pursuits of equity. Eliminating it might reward the acquisition of, and encourage the manufacturing of extra environment friendly autos. And it might type out the messy and ludicrously unjust scenario whereby the two-wheel drive Volkswagen ID.4 misses out on credit that the heavier, hungrier and extra wasteful all-wheel drive model of the identical automobile takes dwelling.

When you nonetheless haven’t learn our clarification of how the IRS arrives at its car categorizations, scroll again up and click on that hyperlink. And tell us what you assume: ought to the IRS simply have one worth cap for all autos?